Products related to Argument:
-
Distributed Leadership and Digital Innovation : The Argument For Couple Leadership
When it comes to digital innovation, much research has been done with regard to the optimization of teams, but little attention has been given to leadership structures.This book presents a comprehensive research background on innovation leadership and its evolution over the years, examining how it has been shown to reflect the thinking needed today for organizations to succeed.This timely book proposes a refreshing and contemporary perspective on leadership that aims to address many of the challenges that leaders in digital innovation are faced with every day.With insights and experiences from other digital innovation leaders, as well as an auto-ethnographical case study, it will be of value to researchers, academics, practitioners, and students with an interest in leadership, innovation management, digital innovation, organization studies, and organizational psychology. Additional Information can be found at https://www.caterinamaniscalco.com/
Price: 19.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Why Argument Matters
Hailed by the New York Times as a book that “examines the role that argument has played throughout history and how it has shaped human existence” “An invigorating reflection on the nature and value of disagreement. . . . Sharp and taut. . . . A lesson in a well-constructed argument itself.”—Publishers Weekly, starred review “Perhaps more than any other commentary, Why Argument Matters illuminates the root causes of our partisan, venomous, irrational times—and yet somehow rescues from the morass the true nature of argument, its power and beauty.”—Michael Wolff, author of Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House From Eve’s crafty exchange with the serpent, to Martin Luther King Jr.’s soaring, subtle ultimatums, to the throes of Twitter—argument’s drainpipe—the human desire to prevail with words has been not just a moral but an existential compulsion.In this dazzling reformulation of argument, renowned critic Lee Siegel portrays the true art of argument as much deeper and far more embracing than mere quarrel, dispute, or debate.It is the supreme expression of humanity’s longing for a better life, born of empathy and of care for the world and those who inhabit it. With wit, passion, and striking insights, Siegel plumbs the emotional and psychological sources of clashing words, weaving through his exploration the untold story of the role argument has played in societies throughout history.Each life, he maintains, is an argument for that particular way of living; every individual style of argument is also a case that is being made for that person’s right to argue.Argument is at the heart of the human experience, and language, at its most liberated and expressive, inexorably bends toward argument.
Price: 20.00 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Narration as Argument
This book presents reflections on the relationship between narratives and argumentative discourse.It focuses on their functional and structural similarities or dissimilarities, and offers diverse perspectives and conceptual tools for analyzing the narratives’ potential power for justification, explanation and persuasion.Divided into two sections, the first Part, under the title “Narratives as Sources of Knowledge and Argument”, includes five chapters addressing rather general, theoretical and characteristically philosophical issues related to the argumentative analysis and understanding of narratives.We may perceive here how scholars in Argumentation Theory have recently approached certain topics that have a close connection with mainstream discussions in epistemology and the cognitive sciences about the justificatory potential of narratives.The second Part, entitled “Argumentative Narratives in Context”, brings us six more chapters that concentrate on either particular functions played by argumentatively-oriented narratives or particular practices that may benefit from the use of special kinds of narratives.Here the focus is either on the detailed analysis of contextualized examples of narratives with argumentative qualities or on the careful understanding of the particular demands of certain well-defined situated activities, as diverse as scientific theorizing or war policing, that may be satisfied by certain uses of narrative discourse.
Price: 89.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Build Your Argument
Trying to make sense of making an argument? This straightforward book breaks down how to build a convincing argument for any type of assessment. Find out what an academic argument is – and what it is notDevelop a toolkit for structuring an argument effectivelyLearn how to use evidence and counterarguments to back up your position. Super Quick Skills provides the essential building blocks you need to succeed at university - fast.Packed with practical, positive advice on core academic and life skills, you’ll discover focused tips and strategies to use straight away.Whether it’s writing great essays, understanding referencing or managing your wellbeing, find out how to build good habits and progress your skills throughout your studies. Learn core skills quicklyApply them right away and see resultsSucceed in your studies and in lifeSuper Quick Skills gives you the foundations you need to confidently navigate the ups and downs of university life.
Price: 7.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
What is the research question regarding animal experimentation?
The research question regarding animal experimentation is typically focused on understanding the potential benefits and ethical considerations of using animals in scientific research. Researchers may investigate the effectiveness of animal models in studying human diseases, the development of alternative methods to reduce or replace animal use, and the ethical implications of using animals in research. Additionally, the research question may also explore the impact of animal experimentation on animal welfare and the potential for translating findings from animal studies to human health outcomes.
-
Does market research hinder innovation in business administration?
Market research does not necessarily hinder innovation in business administration. In fact, it can provide valuable insights into consumer needs and preferences, helping businesses to develop innovative products and services that meet market demands. By understanding market trends and customer behavior, businesses can identify opportunities for innovation and stay ahead of competitors. However, relying too heavily on market research without allowing room for creativity and risk-taking can limit the potential for groundbreaking innovations. It is important for businesses to strike a balance between leveraging market research and fostering a culture of innovation to drive success in business administration.
-
Is this argument appropriate?
Without knowing the specific argument in question, it is difficult to determine its appropriateness. However, in general, an argument can be considered appropriate if it is based on factual evidence, logical reasoning, and respectful communication. It is important to consider the context, audience, and purpose of the argument to determine its appropriateness. Additionally, arguments should aim to promote understanding and constructive dialogue rather than provoke conflict or hostility.
-
What escalates the argument?
Arguments can escalate due to a variety of factors, such as raised voices, personal attacks, lack of listening, and refusal to compromise. When emotions run high and individuals feel unheard or disrespected, the argument can quickly escalate. Additionally, bringing up past grievances or making sweeping generalizations can also fuel the fire and make the argument more intense.
Similar search terms for Argument:
-
Where's Your Argument?
From first steps to final submission, this accessible guide takes students through each stage of the assignment-writing process and equips them with the skills they need to construct and develop convincing academic arguments. Concise and compact, it offers practical advice on forming ideas, structuring arguments and finding your academic voice.The authors, both of whom are experienced in working directly with students, also provide valuable guidance on a number of important subtleties in academic writing, including expressing reservations or enthusiasm in academic writing and using evidence to convey different viewpoints. The second edition contains new material on synthesizing ideas from different sources, as well as more varied examples of what ‘finding your academic voice means’ in the context of different assignments, including blogs and observations. Applicable to different types of assignment, this is an essential resource for all undergraduates and postgraduates who are looking to communicate their arguments effectively and improve the quality of their academic writing.
Price: 7.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £ -
Validity Argument in Language Testing : Case Studies of Validation Research
Language tests play pivotal roles in education, research on learning, and gate-keeping decisions.The central concern for language testing professionals is how to investigate whether or not tests are appropriate for their intended purposes.This book introduces an argument-based validity framework to help with the design of research that investigates the validity of language test interpretation and use.The book presents the principal concepts and technical terms, then shows how they can be implemented successfully in practice through a variety of validation studies.It also demonstrates how argument-based validity intersects with technology in language testing research and highlights the use of validity argument for identifying research questions and interpreting the results of validation research.Use of the framework helps researchers in language testing to communicate clearly and consistently about technical issues with each other and with researchers of other types of tests.
Price: 33.99 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
Enhancing Communication & Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research
Enhancing Communication & Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research, edited by Michael O'Rourke, Stephen Crowley, Sanford D.Eigenbrode, and J. D. Wulfhorst, is a volume of previously unpublished, state-of-the-art chapters on interdisciplinary communication and collaboration written by leading figures and promising junior scholars in the world of interdisciplinary research, education, and administration.Designed to inform both teaching and research, this innovative book covers the spectrum of interdisciplinary activity, offering a timely emphasis on collaborative interdisciplinary work.The book’s four main parts focus on theoretical perspectives, case studies, communication tools, and institutional perspectives, while a final chapter ties together the various strands that emerge in the book and defines trend-lines and future research questions for those conducting work on interdisciplinary communication.
Price: 81.00 £ | Shipping*: 0.00 £ -
An Argument With Myself
Price: 9.99 £ | Shipping*: 3.99 £
-
Is my argument valid?
To determine if your argument is valid, we need to assess whether the conclusion logically follows from the premises. A valid argument is one where if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. To assess the validity of your argument, we need to carefully examine the logical structure and the relationship between the premises and the conclusion. If the conclusion logically follows from the premises, then your argument is valid. If there are any logical fallacies or gaps in reasoning, then the argument may not be valid.
-
What is the difference between developing an argument and refuting an argument?
Developing an argument involves presenting evidence and reasoning to support a particular point of view or claim. This can include providing examples, statistics, and logical reasoning to build a case for a specific position. On the other hand, refuting an argument involves identifying weaknesses or flaws in an opposing argument and providing evidence and reasoning to counter or disprove it. This can include pointing out logical fallacies, presenting conflicting evidence, or demonstrating inconsistencies in the opposing argument. In summary, developing an argument involves building a case for a particular viewpoint, while refuting an argument involves dismantling or disproving an opposing viewpoint.
-
Should one start an argument with the strongest or the weakest argument?
It is generally more effective to start an argument with the strongest argument. This helps to grab the attention of the audience and make a strong initial impact. Starting with the strongest argument can also set the tone for the rest of the discussion and make it more likely for the audience to be persuaded by the overall argument. However, it is important to also address and refute the weaker arguments later in the discussion to strengthen the overall case.
-
What happens after the argument?
After the argument, it is important for both parties to take some time to cool off and reflect on the situation. This can help prevent further escalation and allow for a more productive conversation later on. It may also be helpful to apologize and communicate openly about the issue in order to find a resolution and move forward. It's important to address any underlying issues and work towards rebuilding trust and understanding.
* All prices are inclusive of VAT and, if applicable, plus shipping costs. The offer information is based on the details provided by the respective shop and is updated through automated processes. Real-time updates do not occur, so deviations can occur in individual cases.